Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
af6481a5a7 feat(opencode): one-task-per-run model + 9 routing fixes (ADRs 13-21)
Captures the design grilling outcome. Adds ADRs 13-21 covering:
- run-level plan_rework_remaining counter to bound P3<->P5.5/P7/P8 thrash
- non-resumable workflow with throwaway-worktree recovery procedure
- @simplify advisory at every gate (not just Phase 8)
- Phase 8 fix specs go to disk as task-fix-N.md (preserves ADR-6)
- Phase 5.5 BLOCK protocol: orchestrator edits plan, decrements counter, re-enters P4
- Phase 8 NOT_TESTABLE manifest in reviewer prompt
- unified Implementation Incomplete diagnosis (test_design / production_logic / split_needed)
- Phase 1 working-tree cleanliness + depends-on enforcement
- one-task-per-run pivot: Phase 5 still splits N tasks, only task-1 runs;
  tasks 2..N filed as sub-issues with rich seed bodies; split_needed at P7
  aborts to Failure Handler (one-task-per-run = no salvageable prior work)

Auto-resolves big-diff Phase 8 reviews, cross-task regression-within-run, and
mid-flight task-split routing. Rewrites routing matrix and three Mermaid
diagrams; updates @pm (depends-on frontmatter, split-time filing), @check
(third diagnosis verdict), @make (escalate: split_needed flag).
2026-05-08 13:02:54 +02:00
0b15944d1c docs(opencode): make workflow-design Mermaid diagrams Forgejo-compatible
Forgejo's Mermaid parser is stricter than GitHub's and rejected two
diagrams in workflow-design.md:

1. Flowchart 3.1 — `@check`, `@test`, `@make` in pipe-delimited edge
   labels were tokenised as LINK_ID (newer Mermaid uses `@{...}` for
   edge IDs), e.g. `P7E -->|@check → @test → @make| P7` failed at
   the first @.
2. State diagram 3.2 — the second colon inside transition labels
   (`escalate: test_design`) collided with the `:` field separator
   that splits transition from label.

Drops the @-prefix from labels in all three diagrams (`@check` → `check`
in prose-of-the-label only; ADRs and prose elsewhere keep `@check`
backticked, which is just markdown). Replaces second colons with
descriptive text. Drops parentheses from state-diagram transition
labels. Drops the Unicode arrow `→` in favour of plain words.
Quotes the flowchart node-label strings to keep `<br/>` safe.

The ADR text and prose continue to use `@<name>` references — those
live in markdown, not Mermaid, and render the same.
2026-05-08 10:24:57 +02:00
af0c1d6ea5 docs(opencode): add workflow-design.md as design rationale + decision log
Operational rules in commands/workflow.md and the agent files have
been accreting through repeated patches, with the rationale scattered
across commit messages and conversations. New gaps kept surfacing
after the fact (Phase 7 mid-impl escalation, Phase 8 routing for
test-design findings, Phase 5.5 entirely missing) because there was
no single place to audit the flow.

Adds config/opencode/workflow-design.md as a sibling to commands/
and agents/. It is the design rationale and decision log; operational
rules stay in the command and agent files. The intended flow is:
discuss new ideas / failure modes here → reach a decision → update
the operational files → record the decision in the ADR log.

Pre-populated with: cast & responsibilities table; three Mermaid
diagrams (phase pipeline, Phase 7 escalation state machine, issue
lifecycle); a routing matrix that lists every observed (phase,
signal) → action pair so gaps are visible at a glance; 12 ADRs
covering decisions made over the past several days (forge-agnostic,
TODO/ folder, worktree-only, polyglot agents, absolute-path dispatch,
run artifacts on disk, stub-first Rust TDD, @test inside cfg(test)
mod, Phase 5.5, single-mode @pm, file follow-ups, Phase 7 mid-impl
escalation); and 5 open questions teed up for future discussion.
2026-05-08 10:20:16 +02:00