A workflow run on a Rust/Bevy task produced a single @make dispatch
covering six tasks (~2 hours of work), with the orchestrator drafting
the full replacement code, including a self-contradicting "actually
that's wrong, let me correct…" revision pass and a `nix develop
--command bash -c "cargo check"` invocation that @make's sandbox
denies. None of the failure modes were caught before dispatch.
Phase 5 gains three new subsections:
- Split Heuristic — explicit rules for when a task must be split
(>2 concerns, >50 lines / 2 files, structural+runtime+wiring mix);
prescribes the foundations / implementation / wiring split.
- Code Context Anti-patterns — the field is for seam-revealing
snippets, not finished answers; max ~5-line snippets, no full
replacement bodies.
- Finalized-Text Rule — task specs must be single-author finalized
text, no "actually, that's wrong" revision passes, no two-version
code blocks, no unresolved questions.
Phase 6 promotes the Rust unit-only NOT_TESTABLE case out of the
decision table into a dedicated routing subsection. The orchestrator
must pass test *specifications* (one-line behavior descriptions,
target functions, assertion types) to @make — never test code — and
run the suite once after @make to capture RED→GREEN evidence.
Phase 7 gains a mandatory Pre-Dispatch Validation table that rejects
specs containing `bash -c` / `sh -c` (any nesting), `nix develop -c
bash`, `cd <path> &&`, oversized Code Context blocks, contradictory
revisions, or duplicated test bodies. Repeated trips signal a Phase
5 split problem and route back to splitting.
Harald Hoyer
832306c817