From 8d0099c12edd9731f41998803535f0da9898aefd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chummy Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 18:17:23 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] docs(readme): restore benchmark comparison table and image --- README.md | 22 +++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index aec4f6e..8bd3be5 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -60,11 +60,27 @@ Built by students and members of the Harvard, MIT, and Sundai.Club communities. - **Fully swappable:** core systems are traits (providers, channels, tools, memory, tunnels). - **No lock-in:** OpenAI-compatible provider support + pluggable custom endpoints. -## Benchmark Snapshot (Reproducible) +## Benchmark Snapshot (ZeroClaw vs OpenClaw, Reproducible) -Benchmark claims can drift as code and toolchains evolve, so this section focuses on reproducible local measurement. +Local machine quick benchmark (macOS arm64, Feb 2026) normalized for 0.8GHz edge hardware. -Measure your current build locally: +| | OpenClaw | NanoBot | PicoClaw | ZeroClaw 🦀 | +|---|---|---|---|---| +| **Language** | TypeScript | Python | Go | **Rust** | +| **RAM** | > 1GB | > 100MB | < 10MB | **< 5MB** | +| **Startup (0.8GHz core)** | > 500s | > 30s | < 1s | **< 10ms** | +| **Binary Size** | ~28MB (dist) | N/A (Scripts) | ~8MB | **3.4 MB** | +| **Cost** | Mac Mini $599 | Linux SBC ~$50 | Linux Board $10 | **Any hardware $10** | + +> Notes: ZeroClaw results measured with `/usr/bin/time -l` on release builds. OpenClaw requires Node.js runtime (~390MB overhead). PicoClaw and ZeroClaw are static binaries. + +

+ ZeroClaw vs OpenClaw Comparison +

+ +### Reproducible local measurement + +Benchmark claims can drift as code and toolchains evolve, so always measure your current build locally: ```bash cargo build --release