* chore(ci): establish PR governance for agent collaboration * docs: add AGENTS playbook and strengthen agent collaboration workflow --------- Co-authored-by: chumyin <183474434+chumyin@users.noreply.github.com>
70 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
70 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
## Summary
|
|
|
|
Describe this PR in 2-5 bullets:
|
|
|
|
- Problem:
|
|
- Why it matters:
|
|
- What changed:
|
|
- What did **not** change (scope boundary):
|
|
|
|
## Change Type
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Bug fix
|
|
- [ ] Feature
|
|
- [ ] Refactor
|
|
- [ ] Docs
|
|
- [ ] Security hardening
|
|
- [ ] Chore / infra
|
|
|
|
## Scope
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Core runtime / daemon
|
|
- [ ] Provider integration
|
|
- [ ] Channel integration
|
|
- [ ] Memory / storage
|
|
- [ ] Security / sandbox
|
|
- [ ] CI / release / tooling
|
|
- [ ] Documentation
|
|
|
|
## Linked Issue
|
|
|
|
- Closes #
|
|
- Related #
|
|
|
|
## Testing
|
|
|
|
Commands and result summary (required):
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
cargo fmt --all -- --check
|
|
cargo clippy --all-targets -- -D warnings
|
|
cargo test
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
If any command is intentionally skipped, explain why.
|
|
|
|
## Security Impact
|
|
|
|
- New permissions/capabilities? (`Yes/No`)
|
|
- New external network calls? (`Yes/No`)
|
|
- Secrets/tokens handling changed? (`Yes/No`)
|
|
- File system access scope changed? (`Yes/No`)
|
|
- If any `Yes`, describe risk and mitigation:
|
|
|
|
## Agent Collaboration Notes (recommended)
|
|
|
|
- [ ] If agent/automation tools were used, I added brief workflow notes.
|
|
- [ ] I included concrete validation evidence for this change.
|
|
- [ ] I can explain design choices and rollback steps.
|
|
|
|
If agent tools were used, optional context:
|
|
|
|
- Tool(s):
|
|
- Prompt/plan summary:
|
|
- Verification focus:
|
|
|
|
## Rollback Plan
|
|
|
|
- Fast rollback command/path:
|
|
- Feature flags or config toggles (if any):
|
|
- Observable failure symptoms:
|